operating system vulnerability comparison

OmniNerd posted a rather lengthy article comparing various default installations of most modern operating systems (released in 2006, I think) using nmap and nessus to determine the vulnerability of said distributions to remote attacks. While simplistic in assessment and lengthy in discourse, the biggest takeaway I got from this article in my brief skim aligns with what I believe anyway. Operating systems have weaknesses, strengths, and problems, but ultimately it is a knowledgeable and diligent admin that makes a system secure (or more secure, if you will), and normal users can turn an OS into swiss cheese very easily.

One thought on “operating system vulnerability comparison

  1. FreeBSD and FC6 reign that comparison. Funny because I usually use those… wish there was mention of NetBSD though…

Comments are closed.